<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Devoteam</provider_name><provider_url>https://devoteam.info/ch/</provider_url><author_name>dkeva</author_name><author_url>https://devoteam.info/ch/author/dkeva/</author_url><title>Linear Velocity, Not Doom Curves: Data Showing Why Classic Communication Models Fall Short</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Jwm0rfnXqp"&gt;&lt;a href="https://devoteam.info/ch/expert-view/linear-velocity-not-doom-curves/"&gt;Linear Velocity, Not Doom Curves: Data Showing Why Classic Communication Models Fall Short&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://devoteam.info/ch/expert-view/linear-velocity-not-doom-curves/embed/#?secret=Jwm0rfnXqp" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Linear Velocity, Not Doom Curves: Data Showing Why Classic Communication Models Fall Short&#x201D; &#x2014; Devoteam" data-secret="Jwm0rfnXqp" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://devoteam.info/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://devoteam.info/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Devoteam_Expert-view_Team-velocity-1.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1000</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>600</thumbnail_height><description>The Empirical Challenge to Agile Scaling Myths Optimal team size is a core challenge in the Agile world. This challenge typically stems from the theoretical fear of productivity loss. For decades, conventional wisdom, backed by early psychological and management research, has converged on a consensus: small is inherently better. This view is well-supported by established [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
